<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: WP Super Cache - The Ultimate WordPress Caching Plugin</title>
	<atom:link href="http://allmybrain.com/2007/11/06/wp-super-cache-the-ultimate-wordpress-caching-plugin/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://allmybrain.com/2007/11/06/wp-super-cache-the-ultimate-wordpress-caching-plugin/</link>
	<description>Where stuff from my brain lands</description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 21 Nov 2008 21:50:24 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.2</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: sohbet</title>
		<link>http://allmybrain.com/2007/11/06/wp-super-cache-the-ultimate-wordpress-caching-plugin/#comment-681</link>
		<dc:creator>sohbet</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 Oct 2008 09:19:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://allmybrain.com/2007/11/06/wp-super-cache-the-ultimate-wordpress-caching-plugin/#comment-681</guid>
		<description>first I congratulate for your site, I have enjoyed your site in a general look. I wish for continuance of your success</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>first I congratulate for your site, I have enjoyed your site in a general look. I wish for continuance of your success</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dennis</title>
		<link>http://allmybrain.com/2007/11/06/wp-super-cache-the-ultimate-wordpress-caching-plugin/#comment-671</link>
		<dc:creator>Dennis</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Sep 2008 02:57:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://allmybrain.com/2007/11/06/wp-super-cache-the-ultimate-wordpress-caching-plugin/#comment-671</guid>
		<description>It seems like widget caching would be fine in a circumstance where the super-cache wouldn't work, but super cache works equally as well with googlebot as with normal users.  I'm not sure the benefit of widget caching when super cache is enabled.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It seems like widget caching would be fine in a circumstance where the super-cache wouldn&#8217;t work, but super cache works equally as well with googlebot as with normal users.  I&#8217;m not sure the benefit of widget caching when super cache is enabled.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andrew</title>
		<link>http://allmybrain.com/2007/11/06/wp-super-cache-the-ultimate-wordpress-caching-plugin/#comment-669</link>
		<dc:creator>Andrew</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Sep 2008 01:27:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://allmybrain.com/2007/11/06/wp-super-cache-the-ultimate-wordpress-caching-plugin/#comment-669</guid>
		<description>Hi Dennis,

I just write a new plugin WP Widget Cache, which can cache the output of your blog widgets. It will significantly reduce the server usage especially when Google is crawling your site. So you can treat it as a plus to WP Super Cache.

Will you please have a try. Thanks very much.

Here is the plugin url:
http://wordpress.org/extend/plugins/wp-widget-cache/</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Dennis,</p>
<p>I just write a new plugin WP Widget Cache, which can cache the output of your blog widgets. It will significantly reduce the server usage especially when Google is crawling your site. So you can treat it as a plus to WP Super Cache.</p>
<p>Will you please have a try. Thanks very much.</p>
<p>Here is the plugin url:<br />
<a href="http://wordpress.org/extend/plugins/wp-widget-cache/" rel="nofollow">http://wordpress.org/extend/plugins/wp-widget-cache/</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
