<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Microsoft exchange hosting with Sharepoint</title>
	<atom:link href="http://allmybrain.com/2009/01/15/microsoft-exchange-hosting-with-sharepoint/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://allmybrain.com/2009/01/15/microsoft-exchange-hosting-with-sharepoint/</link>
	<description>Where stuff from my brain lands</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 07 Feb 2012 16:14:05 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Pankaj</title>
		<link>http://allmybrain.com/2009/01/15/microsoft-exchange-hosting-with-sharepoint/comment-page-1/#comment-945</link>
		<dc:creator>Pankaj</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Sep 2009 20:43:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://allmybrain.com/?p=211#comment-945</guid>
		<description>Another option for those who do not want to set up servers for in house SharePoint, is to go for a &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.hyperoffice.com/hosted-sharepoint/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;hosted sharepoint alternative like HyperOffice&lt;/a&gt;. Unlike &quot;hosted sharepoint&quot; these solutions are not SharePoint based, but web 2.0 products which bring functionality similar to SharePoint. The benefit is, that unlike SharePoint these solutions are web native, and very easy for end users to operate.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Another option for those who do not want to set up servers for in house SharePoint, is to go for a <a href="http://www.hyperoffice.com/hosted-sharepoint/" rel="nofollow">hosted sharepoint alternative like HyperOffice</a>. Unlike &#8220;hosted sharepoint&#8221; these solutions are not SharePoint based, but web 2.0 products which bring functionality similar to SharePoint. The benefit is, that unlike SharePoint these solutions are web native, and very easy for end users to operate.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

