Comments on: Extending std::exception http://allmybrain.com/2009/05/12/extending-stdexception/ Where stuff from my brain lands Tue, 07 Feb 2012 16:14:05 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1 By: rk http://allmybrain.com/2009/05/12/extending-stdexception/comment-page-1/#comment-994 rk Wed, 13 Jan 2010 15:39:43 +0000 http://allmybrain.com/?p=276#comment-994 Hi, 1. Constructors are never virtual, I think you mean the assignment operator. 2. Since you are catching a base class exception reference or a pointer u really do not need to overload the assignment operator. I think you are trying catch(std::exception e) which is not the right way to do it. 3. The runtime_error uses std::string as a member variable. Ramesh Hi,

1. Constructors are never virtual, I think you mean the assignment operator.

2. Since you are catching a base class exception reference or a pointer u really do not need to overload the assignment operator. I think you are trying
catch(std::exception e) which is not the right way to do it.

3. The runtime_error uses std::string as a member variable.

Ramesh

]]> By: jansson http://allmybrain.com/2009/05/12/extending-stdexception/comment-page-1/#comment-891 jansson Fri, 15 May 2009 08:54:13 +0000 http://allmybrain.com/?p=276#comment-891 I would like to comment that there is quite a lot to read about the purpose and usage of the exception inhertiance hiearchy in the C++ Standard. Thank you for a nice posting. I would like to comment that there is quite a lot to read about the purpose and usage of the exception inhertiance hiearchy in the C++ Standard.

Thank you for a nice posting.

]]>