<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>All My Brain &#187; seo</title>
	<atom:link href="http://allmybrain.com/tag/seo/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://allmybrain.com</link>
	<description>Where stuff from my brain lands</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 15 Apr 2012 23:46:46 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Categories vs Tags</title>
		<link>http://allmybrain.com/2007/10/01/categories-vs-tags/</link>
		<comments>http://allmybrain.com/2007/10/01/categories-vs-tags/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Oct 2007 00:49:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Dennis</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Web]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[blogging]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[plugins]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[seo]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tags]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[widgets]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[wordpress]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://allmybrain.com/2007/10/01/categories-vs-tags/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I found a couple plugins that make the tag and category features function the way I'd like. Simple TaggingThis plugin allows each post to have an associated set of tags. This enables a clean category system while still being able to show the subjects that each post talks about. Simple Tagging Widget This widget Enables [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://allmybrain.com/2007/10/01/categories-vs-tags/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Permalinks</title>
		<link>http://allmybrain.com/2007/10/01/permalinks/</link>
		<comments>http://allmybrain.com/2007/10/01/permalinks/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Oct 2007 15:29:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Dennis</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Web]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[blogging]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[internet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[permalinks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[seo]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[wordpress]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://allmybrain.com/2007/10/01/permalinks/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I've played around quite a bit with link structure for various sites I've programmed. I've found that Google will index your pages whether they have a parameterized URLs: http://somesite.example?param1=this&#038;param2=that or parameterized Paths (Permalinks): http://somesite.example/this/that I think, however, that in general, search engines like the path portion of the URL better than they like than the [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://allmybrain.com/2007/10/01/permalinks/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

